This blog is used and maintained by the ACRL Philosophical, Religious, and Theological Discussion Group convener and members. It is a repository of information on these topics, and a sounding board for developments and knowledge in these areas.
Monday, June 14, 2010
PhilPapers
PhilPapers uses automated processes to monitor and harvest indexing content of online journals (including subscription-based ones; full list is here). They also harvest papers on philosophers' web sites, certain online archives of papers, original submissions from users and papers inherited from an earlier project, Mindpapers. While all papers are indexed and searchable by their respective metadata, subscription-based journal content is only accessible if the user has the appropriate permissions (via personal or institutional subscription). The result of all this aggregation is an impressive, centralized index of philosophy content - not unlike what Google Scholar would be if scoped only to philosophy and curated by academic philosophers.
PhilPapers is a step beyond online philosophy archives thus far, and in many ways. It aggregates much more content than other archives have, and does much more with that content to make it accessible and meaningful. One of the key features of PhilPapers is its categorization of papers into philosophical subfields and sub-subfields based on an original taxonomy of philosophy. The librarians among us are likely to appreciate the value that controlled vocabulary, taxonomy and /or tagging can contribute to an index. Some categorization of materials is automated in PhilPapers, but users are also encouraged to use the taxonomy to supply categories to papers.
This isn't the only contribution that users are encouraged to make. As mentioned earlier, PhilPapers also accepts original content from users, if the original content is "professional-quality work in academic philosophy." The submission can be a link to an online paper hosted elsewhere, or the file itself.
PhilPapers also hosts an online forum for users to interact on professional or philosophical issues (noted as being intended for professional philosophers and graduate students). These forums tend to be a vibrant space for discussion, refinement of argument and sharing.
All in all, PhilPapers seems to be getting it right. They've created a highly useful and highly used service for a defined user community, leveraging the flexibility of online publication to make materials accessible in an interactive context. As a service to academic philosophers, the defined scope will likely be appealing: it fulfills a digital-savvy philosopher's expectations while also eliminating the non-philosophical "noise" that would have been encountered on the open web, in Google Scholar or in institutional library catalogs and repositories. The "good stuff" is here and PhilPapers' criteria for inclusion seem to indicate that if materials aren't peer-reviewed, they will at least be vetted as "professional-quality."
In terms of service to the public at large, PhilPapers is susceptible to the same criticism leveled at Google Scholar by librarians, namely that indexing of subscription-based items is misleading since users not affiliated with a subscribing institution won't have access. But the intended audience for this resource - professional philosophers - generally doesn't have this problem.
So what do you think? Are you impressed with PhilPapers? Unimpressed? Are faculty at your institution using it? How might we engage PhilPapers in outreach to faculty? How might we use it in instruction? Are their other open web resources you're aware of doing similar things, especially any in religion and theology?
Wednesday, June 9, 2010
ALA Annual Meeting
Saturday, June 26th, 2010, 8:00 to 10:00am.
Location: Hyatt Regency Washington on Capitol Hill, Room: Columbia B
This will be a joint meeting with the WESS Classical Medieval Renaissance (CMR) Discussion Group, on the very general topic of "online publication."
Agenda
The Philosophy Documentation Center www.pdcnet.org
George Leaman, Director, and Susanne Mueller-Grote, Electronic Publishing and Marketing Manager
Oxford Bibliographies (www.oxfordbibliographiesonline.com) and Oxford Biblical Studies Online www.oxfordbiblicalstudies.com
Damon Zucca, Executive Editor, Reference Division, Oxford University Press
The Online Publications Program of the Center for Hellenic Studies chs.harvard.edu
Noel Spencer and Jeremy Linn
Friday, February 27, 2009
Theology, Religion, and Philosophy Librarian position at Baylor University
http://joblist.ala.org/modules/jobseeker/controller.cfm?scr=jobdetail&jobid=12740
http://www.baylor.edu/hr_services/index.php?id=22640
Such a rare event to see all three disciplines in one heading!
Tuesday, January 20, 2009
2009 Midwinter Agenda
1/25/2009 Sunday 04:00 pm - 05:30 pm RITZ Cameron
(1) Vendor Presentation of Brill's Online Resources for Islamic Studies cf. http://www.brill.nl/default.
(2) Faculty outreach. What are some ways we've successfully (and unsuccessfully) reached out to faculty? Let's post some of the more promising strategies on the PRT blog. http://prtdiscussiongroup.
(3) Bibliographic instruction in philosophy. Philosophy doesn't seem to be an area that lends itself readily to library instruction. Lower-level courses usually don't involve much independent research, while faculty often are reluctant to sacrifice class time in higher-level courses. Has anyone had any success in providing bibliographic instruction for such classes? What works? What doesn't?
(4) Collections Budget. Meeting faculty needs with reduced budgets.
(5) Ideas for Annual
(6) Open Discussion
Hope to see you there!
Friday, July 25, 2008
World religions resources
-Miranda